California
Needs a GOOD Homeschool Law!
By
Kathleen Moore Kordenbrock
California has been sitting on the fence between
schools and homeschools now for over 30 years, alternately approving and
disapproving of parents who wish to educate their own children at home.
The pendulum swings across the state from counties and school districts
that are cooperative and helpful to those who are difficult and sometimes
downright hostile.
Officials even at the California Department of
Education seem to have been drawn to both ends of the spectrum.
At the positive end we have a letter from the then Superintendent of
Public Instruction Bill Hoenig written to homeschoolers in the fall of 1982,
giving them permission to use the Private School Affidavit (PSA) to turn their
homeschools into “mini” private schools.
At the negative end we have some state lawyers who have insisted over the
years that homeschooling is not legal in California.
We as homeschoolers should not return a hostile
attitude, but work together for a good law to benefit our children. We must not
approach schools and education officials as the enemy.
Many have been very helpful. Officials
come and go, and we need to be constantly informing and educating them.
What Now?
The present Superintendent of Public Instruction for
the State of California Delaine Eastin sent out a letter on July 16, 2002,
outlining the new online process for filing the PSA or R-4 Affidavit.
Many homeschoolers reacted with anger and frustration to the line at the
end of the letter, which stated that “those parents who home school their
children are operating outside the law…”
Outraged homeschool advocates descended upon her with phone calls and
faxes, which prompted her to demand homeschool legislation from the California
State Assembly three days before they broke session at the end of August.
It is unfortunate that feathers were ruffled on both
sides. Both reactions were
unnecessary and unwarranted. We all
need to calm down and look carefully at the issues.
First of all, the law has not changed.
Many thousands of families have homeschooled in the State of California
for 20 years believing, based on the letter from Mr. Hoenig, that they were
complying to the best of their ability with the law by filing a PSA.
Now I’m no lawyer, but it looks to me as if a precedent has been
established here.
Secondly, the problem as I see it is that
homeschooling is not specifically addressed in the California law.
That’s why we have had the disagreements (including court cases),
waffling and confusion of these past decades.
What we do need is a good law! There
are many states (Virginia, Missouri, Alaska, etc.), who have good laws and
enough history of implementation for legislators to get a clear idea of how they
work.
As the moment we have no homeschool bill submitted
to the California legislature, but now may not be the best time to begin this
process anyway, considering the present liberal legislature and governor.
But we need to do our homework!
Thirdly, we need, as homeschoolers and educators, to
present a selfless and united front, working in a reasonable and deliberate way
to ensure that we enact the best possible laws. We need to look deep into the mirror, making sure our own
motives are above reproach.
A Standoff?
The uncertainty of the legal climate in California
these past years has produced an infrastructure of “umbrella schools” and
homeschool “insurance.” But
many homeschoolers see them as hampering rather than enhancing their freedoms.
Some independent homeschoolers have filed (or
purposely not filed) the R-4 Affidavit, discounting the fear of being
“visited” or “known.” (Of
course, if homeschoolers didn’t have an independent nature, their children
would be in school!) But these
parents are particularly self-sufficient and resist any kind of control, not
only of the State, but even of the “insurance” and “umbrella”
organizations.
However, most appreciate the initial role played by
those who have provided “insurance” for homeschoolers who have been
challenged by a school or a district. They
have also valued those “umbrella schools” with which homeschoolers could
enroll to avoid the fear of putting their own names and addresses into county
and state files. Yet these
structures have now become embedded in California’s homeschool society and
made themselves so indispensable as to keep many parents from seeing the reality
of the need for a good law.
And now these organizations don’t want to
leave—they’re well established and making good money. They may be out of business in California, if the legislature
enacts a good law. I run an
“umbrella” school in this state, too, but if there is a choice between a
good homeschool law and keeping my school open, I will move on by choosing to
embrace a law that benefits homeschooled children.
Thus we have a three-way standoff:
the State with its legislature, the homeschool organizations with their
supporters, and the independent homeschoolers.
The State wants the federal and state money promised for each student
enrolled in their public schools and charter schools. (See
Judy Shewmake’s article about Charter Schools.)
The “umbrella” and “insurance” organizations want their tuition
and member dues. And the
homeschoolers (even those who support those organizations and may not yet have
seen the “big picture”) just want the freedom to follow their consciences in
choosing the education of their children.
Conclusion
What is the priority here?
Are we looking for the best education for our children or are we looking
for dollars? I do not mean to imply
that all education officials and all homeschool organizations are in business
just for the money. That would not be true.
Many have good motives, but it still comes down to a marketing issue,
doesn’t it? What’s more
important? The product or the
profit?
Let’s look at this in the right light—all of us!
We may disagree on method, but we can all agree that we love our children
and want them to be properly educated. We
must believe that we can find ways to cooperate in getting California a good
homeschool law, in order to provide for those parents who are willing to put
forth the effort to properly educate their children themselves.
© 2002 Editorial for The Moore Report International September/October 2002